I often see moms comparing our national debt to their household budget, and being perplexed about why the USA can't simply pay off its debts and live within a budget. I'd need too many column inches to talk about the reasons for the national budget ceiling being raised every year, but some of the reasons are valid, in my understanding, and many are far less so.
In a nutshell, though, the main legitimate reason to raise the debt ceiling is to pay off the previous year's spending. Not raising the ceiling is essentially refusing to honor existing debts, which has a negative impact on our ability to continue to trade with other nations or maintain a respectable credit rating.
Our current administration needed to increase the national debt to stimulate the economy and prevent a recession, because the economy was already on fire when it was handed over. Economic experts generally agree that this worked, though at great cost, and some believe the dollars spent could have been more effectively used than rescuing big banks and major industries.
The banks have paid back most of their stimulus money, with interest. However, they have failed to use much of the stimulus money to help relieve the housing crisis, which has now mushroomed into a major economic panic that has spread around the world. Ten million homeowners were supposed to benefit from that infusion of money. Fewer than a million have actually been helped. The banks have used the stimulus money to build their profits and their reserves, not help their mortgage holders. And now every industrialized nation is struggling with the aftereffects of our nation's bad behavior, and I do feel worried and embarrassed about that.
Previous administrations have increased our national debt by engaging in wars that were over and above the current year's budget, and had to be figured into subsequent budgets. Wars, Social Security, and Medicare are the big three national expenses.
However, wars are THE big unfunded issue. Most citizens have paid in advance for their SS benefits during their working lives, and have paid taxes for their whole lives on the understanding that some of these taxes would eventually help pay for a health policy in their retirement years. Basic Medicare is taxpayer-funded, as I understand it, but supplemental coverage is paid for by each individual. My husband has just qualified for Medicare, and he's still paying nearly what he paid for a private insurance policy, but without impossibly high deductibles. He also started receiving SS benefits when he turned 65. I will have to wait till I'm 66 to qualify – one of the ways the system has been tweaked to help it remain viable.
But Congress started dipping into the SS funds to pay for other projects, like undeclared wars, years ago. Those funds were supposed to be held in trust for the taxpayers who paid them. That trust was broken, and now some legislators want to undo the rest of the social security system. Fine, but can I have back some of that money I've paid in all my life so I can pay for the health care I need now? And what, pray tell, am I supposed to retire on? Medical expenses will soon finish off our life savings, and we'll be dipping into our personal retirement accounts, not to live on, but to keep me alive.
So, look at the ultimate effect of policies like these on our families, like my daughter, son-in-law, and grandson. What will they do when their parents run out of money? Will they stand by and wait for us to die of treatable illnesses? Will they watch us get turned out of our homes? Or will they pitch in and pay more out of their own budgets when the old folks' resources are depleted? What will happen in millions of similar families across the nation?
I predict that the upheaval that's coming will be severe. And exceedingly expensive, in both dollars and lives. Families who are very well fixed financially won't feel too much strain, perhaps, but the 99% of us who have done our best all our lives, made the best choices we had available to us, worked industriously and saved, and then had promises broken and the rules changed after years of planning and contributing, will be hit hard. Are already being hit hard. And some people are already homeless, living in their cars or on friends' couches, or dying for lack of affordable medical care.
Rearranging the tax code to equalize the playing field a bit would be far less catastrophic, and far less expensive. And we could begin to pay down the national debt. The people who have benefited the most from our national policies have in previous generations been expected to pay higher taxes for the privileges and advantages they have received. But now they call the 99% of us the "entitled" ones. Wrong. The wealthy are the ones who are behaving as if they are entitled.
We are passing on to our children something far more significant than a debt for them to pay off in taxes. We are giving them a system that is already breaking for far too many of us. Corporate greed has sucked millions of Americans' jobs and pensions away, hit the housing market hard, driven up energy and food to where more folks every month have to choose between shelter and food. It is driving relentless health care costs. It is making mortgage adjustments unavailable for those whose homes have lost resale value.
And all the while, those with power and money are benefiting from deregulation and legislative policies. (Added: The wealthiest Americans incomes have risen over 250% over the past three decades. Middle class workers have gone up 40% during the same period. Low income earners have stagnated.)
And now, police in some cities are trying to protect the status quo by attacking people in desperate need with tear gas and rubber bullets.
You bet I am ashamed. And deeply alarmed.