Hi A.,
Sigh. I'm getting tired of having to respond to Nicole's constrant recommendation to see a NAET "allergist." There is NO scientific evidence that applied kinesiology can either diagnose allergy or be used to treat it. The process makes absolutely zero physiological sense. The amazing thing about NAET is that it "finds" allergies at a rate that is about 60 times higher than are found to exist according to scientifically sound epidemeological studies. Considering that it is so good at finding things that probably aren't there in the first place, it is no wonder that it has great success in "curing" them. I have no doubt that believers find relief in the treatments -- psychosomatic relief can be as real as psychosomatic illness and I do believe that many chiropractic practices really can make people feel better -- this just isn't one of them!
Since your child's milk allergy has been diagnosed, I assume you've had some reputable testing done and that other allergies have been ruled out. It is true that some people can have multiple sensitivities, but we're finding more and more that it is rare for an individual to be sensitized to more than 2 or 3 allergens (although it does happen). You should be aware, however, that allergy is a progressive disease that can evolve into allergies to inhaled allergens (molds, pollens, etc) and the endpoint of the disease can be asthma. Practicing strict avoidance of allergens can slow or halt this progression, however, so it is very, very important to do exactly what you're doing. Fortunately, many children will outgrow their food allergies, so it is worthwhile having your son tested every few years.
Also, I encourage you to keep up with your baby's immunization schedule. Exhaustive metanalysis of the breadth of studies that have investigated the connection between immunizations (especially MMR) and at least autism have conclusively shown that there is no supportable link. In fact, a specially convened vaccine investigatory court just ruled this morning that there IS NO LINK BETWEEN CHILDHOOD VACCINATIONS AND AUTISM. See: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/02/12/health/main###-...
The problem with the rationale behind the claimed links to immunizations and other childhood diseases that are "on the rise" is that the evidence is predominantly circumstantial and anecdotal. They run along the lines of "immunizations are given in childhood. Allergy, autism, ADD and ADHD are diagnosed in childhood. Allergy, autism, ADD and ADHD prevalence appears to be increasing. Therefore, vaccines must be the cause." This is faulty reasoning. I would suggest that these diseases aren't actually increasing in prevalence (except for allergy, which is more likely to be linked to improved modern hygiene, oddly enough), but rather that our ability to RECOGNIZE and diagnose them is what is increasing.
Not surprisingly, these types of medical advances are keeping pace with the sciences of immunology and virology that enable the development of new vaccines. We have generated more scientific and medical research in the last fifty years than had been generated throughout all the rest of human history. The sheer number of scientific papers published annually is testament to this: consider that in 1665 there were only two scientific publications in the world (one in France and one in England), and these covered diverse topics in physics, chemistry, anatomy and neurolgy. Now, over 1 MILLION articles are published each year!
Vaccines have proven to be a tremendous boon to humanity. Witness the elimination or virtual elimination of killers such as smallpox and polio, the control of diseases such as Rubella, which was responsible for large numbers of miscarriages and children born with congenital rubella syndrome -- a life long disease characterized by cataracts, hearing loss, mental retardation, learning disabilities, and diabetes and schizophrenia in some cases later in life. The relative risks of substantial damage or death involved from contracting these and other diseases (such as measles) are much higher than the risks of a severe negative reaction to an immunization. Negative reactions are fairly rare events, so they tend to get far more attention and publicity than the millions upon millions of children (and adults) who have had no adverse reaction.
My apologies for using your request as a soapbox! Oh yes, and about your question. Beans are an excellent source of protein, fats and B-complex vitamins. Green leafy veges are high in calcium. Some orange juice brands also offer a calcium-enriched variety. Eggs are a good source of protein and fats, although the yolk is high in cholesterol (but your little one needs this to grow right now, anyway), however they also tend to be a major allergen. Soy milk, rice milk, and nut milks can provide good nutrition and are typically calcium fortified but tend to be higher in sugars. Soy and tree nuts are high on the list of potential allergens, too. Meat, chicken, and fish all provide proteins and fats. And then, there's the good ol' polyvifluor! This can be a very important source of vitamin-D and folate, both of which are essential for calcium uptake and bone development.