Repeat Kindergarten - Sacramento

Updated on February 20, 2014
N.M. asks from Roseville, CA
14 answers

Hello everyone,

My daughter turned 5 last September and was age-appropriate to start kindergarten (cutoff date was Oct. 2). She was too old for early kindergarten so that wasn't an option. If she didn't start kindergarten, we would have had to keep her in pre-school where she would be the oldest playing with other kids who are 1 to 2 years younger; all her other friends either went to kindergarten or early kindergarten. Her pre-school said she was ready for kindergarten. So far, so good, right?

Here's the issue: She is small for her age, but she is between proficient and above-proficient in all categories. She reads extremely well for a 5.5 year old and probably better than her classmates. There are a few things that are not as developed such as speed in finishing work (she's methodical and admits that she's slow because she doesn't want to make mistakes) and that she's bashful. I say "bashful" instead of "shy" because it takes a bit to warm up, not like kids who like to show what they know. To me, "shy" is like being reserved or a bit hard to open up. She doesn't have as many buddies in her class mainly because she likes to hang out by herself and watch the others run around the playground. Also, kindergarten is half-day and she doesn't spend much time with her classmates outside of school as we know that some others do. She is, no doubt, an introvert, but has good social skills.

During our very first parent-teacher conference, her kindergarten teacher, who is nearly 6 feet tall and admits to have always being tall for her age, said our daughter is "less mature" and smaller than most others in the class, after she told us that she's doing very well academically. I'm going to assume that "less mature" isn't the same as "immature", but I could be wrong when it comes to teacher-speak. We were given a soft recommendation to consider having her repeat kindergarten, hence our concern of something that's not as absolute to base our decision on.

We have come to the conclusion that our child has been labelled by her teacher and most likely other faculty regardless of her academic development. Her size is due to genetics. Both sides of the family do not have Amazonian or Scandanavian blood. Plus, our daughter is most likely considered small compared to kids who will be entering kindergarten next year.

I'm interested in what others may have experienced with their "small but average" kindergarteners. It seems very premature to retain her in kindergarten considering that she's meeting and exceeding many of the standards. Believe me, she know way more than both her mom and me ever knew at 5.5 years old.

Thanks!

What can I do next?

  • Add yourAnswer own comment
  • Ask your own question Add Question
  • Join the Mamapedia community Mamapedia
  • as inappropriate
  • this with your friends

So What Happened?

Nothing to report yet, but just want to thank all of you for your valuable input on this matter.

In response to some of you, I'm not sure if being less coordinated than others is a valid reason for retention. Retention does not always equate to guaranteed success. As an extreme example, I hope we don't go down the path of the Third Reich where we're trying to create the perfect generation while casting dispersion on anything that may be perceived as a deficiency, especially among young children. Shouldn't we believe that recognizing variety and diversity provides as many learning opportunities for young children as organized activities such as sports? School is about academics, first and foremost. Size, coordination, and "maturity" (I know people well into their 40's who are not exactly mature) are important characteristics to be aware of, but if a child's academic ability is consistently proficient and/or above proficient, then it would not make any sense to retain them. I believe our perception in how make our children succeed has gone too far and we need to stop studying child development through a microscope.

Again, thank you all and I'll keep everyone posted on what develops in the upcoming weeks.

More Answers

Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

K.L.

answers from Washington DC on

My daughter has an end of August birthday and our cut-off is September 30. We also sent her to kindergarten when she had just turned five. She is TINY for her age. I'm pretty sure she was the second smallest kid in her grade last year (out of 120 kids). She is 12 and in the 7th grade. Weighs only 75 pounds. She is smaller than my 10 year old 4th grade daughter. It is what it is!

We had the same conversation that you are now having. It finally came down to the fact that we were going to hold her back a year just because she was small. We chose to keep her going where she was. I have no regrets. She is now in 7th grade and has gotten all A's both first and second quarter this school year. Is she a little immature? (I actually like how you said "less mature" - that makes more sense!) Maybe she is. She sometimes still plays American Girl with her little sister (although she probably would not admit this to her friends). She has friends, but she's not getting invited to parties every weekend. She's a happy kid and I think she's where she belongs.

I don't know if this helps, but I just thought I'd share my story of my "little" girl. Best wishes to you! :)

5 moms found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

J.K.

answers from Los Angeles on

If your daughter is keeping up academically, she should move up. She'll just get bored having to "learn" everything she already knows. Her mind will wander instead of being challenged. Her social skills and maturity will catch up soon.

5 moms found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

M.C.

answers from Washington DC on

Her size and petite stature should NOT play a role in whether or not she advances to 1st grade.

My son who is in middle school has SEVERAL kids that are his age (11-12y) and around 4ft tall. I went on a field trip. 6 kids in my group 12-13y. Shortest kid was 4'10". Tallest kid was 6'1". They were the same age.

One kid that I saw in the office, I thought had been dropped off at the wrong school! He was the height of an average 3rd-4th grader. Nope he was a 6th grader. (It didn't help my image of him that he was carrying a happy meal into the school!)The office personnel knew him.

Advancing to 1st grade should be based on two things.
1. academics. If she can do the work expected of her, let her go.
2. social maturity. if she interacts with her classmates on an equal level. she is fine.

If she refuses to speak, or has temper tantrums, or other key things that a younger child would do, then I would consider keeping her back.

Also, it is only Feb. you have 7 months of growth and maturing, before a real decision needs to be made.

3 moms found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

A.M.

answers from Washington DC on

Full disclosure: I'm a teacher and I like the August cut-off dates though I personally started kindergarten at 4. My girls were already 5.5 entering K and I think it helped them immensely. Especially the very petite younger one. She was significantly smaller than most of her peers and only recently (starting 2nd grade) not the smallest in her class.

I teach middle school where kids can range from so small I initially mistake them for elementary schoolers visiting an older sibling to tall students who look like they belong in college! Often, physically smaller students are the ones who are less emotionally or socially mature than their peers, but this isn't universally true. However, there is a correlation sometimes between physical development and certain types of motor skills that can make a difference in whether a student will thrive in the next grade level or struggle. Kindergarten at my younger daughter's school was not about knowing, but about doing. A child who was very verbal with lots of background knowledge but couldn't manage a pencil well was retained. His parents switched schools so I can't say how he did after that.

Kindergarten teachers see hundreds of 5 & 6 year olds in a career and have the benefit of discussing norms & expectations for that age with their coworkers and other professional peers. You have the benefit of seeing your daughter in a setting in which she is more comfortable. Request a conference and come up with an action plan. It is February. What should your daughter show you and her teacher to demonstrate she is ready for first grade? When should she be able to show it? What can you do to help support her development in that direction?

3 moms found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

K.C.

answers from Los Angeles on

Retaining a child because of their size is absolutely ridiculous to me. First of all, I'd like to say that I'm really glad you put your daughter into kinder in the first place. I am a firm believer that most kids are ready for kindergarten when they are age-appropriate and I'm against redshirting in most cases (though I do believe some are warranted). So I think you made the right decision in starting her.

Some kids are meant to be short. Some kids are meant to be tall. Some are average. As you said, your daughter would be a short kindergartener next year too. So she still would have the same label, only then she'd be without her friends and she'd be bored repeating the work she's already done.

I was a TINY child. Always the smallest in my class, usually smaller than kids one or two grades behind me. My son, at his 5 year checkup, was the same height I was at my 8 year checkup, and he was about 10 lbs heavier! He's bigger than average for his age, but not huge by any means. I was just tiny. I didn't start growing until I was 15 and I topped out at 5'3" I got teased by only one boy in elementary school and easily stopped it by making one mean comment back to him. Maybe not the best way to handle it, but it worked. No one else teased me in elementary. I did get teased in 7th grade, but honestly, I would have been teased in 7th grade if I was there a year or two later, too, because I was just as small.

My point is, your daughter should move on to first grade. She's academically proficient. There is nothing wrong with being bashful or introverted. We can't all be extroverts - the world NEEDS people to have different personalities. We need leaders, but we also need followers.

Absolutely nothing you said makes me think retaining her is the right move.

1 mom found this helpful

J.S.

answers from Richland on

If she is small she is small, holding her back won't change her gene pool. Sure and older child would be bigger than a younger child but if you are small that isn't going to make a noticeable difference. You would probably have to hold her back four years to make her the same size as the other kids, does that sound rational to you?

Should tall kids go to kindergarten when they are two? My son's friend was as tall as me in fourth grade, he stopped growing in high school at 7 ft 2! In my daughter's class one of her friends didn't hit the height and weight restrictions to sit in the front seat of a car, when she was learning to drive! How long would she have been held back. She was a mean point guard by the way. Size means nothing.

1 mom found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

C.S.

answers from Miami on

If she is in a public school, they can not hold her back in kindergarten without an academic reason. Go to the principal and ask what their academic criteria for promotion are in kindergarten. Here is an example if you haven't been given one:

https://www.ocps.net/lc/west/emt/AC/Documents/0_Promotion...

IF she meets whatever the criteria are at your school (not now, but by the end of the academic year) than insist she go to first grade. Being short has absolutely nothing to do with it.

I would suggest some playdates with her classmates or enrolling her in an afterschool activity, maybe soccer or an art or music class. Also, check with your pediatrician to make sure she is on her growth projectory - it is totally normal to be 10th percentile and stay at 10th percentile but NOT normal to be at 60th and then drop to 10th. If she is steady than she is fine!

In 1993, I finished my bachelors at the age of 20. I was 5'2" and about 100 lbs. I accepted a position at JCPenney in the management training program, completed it and was assigned to a store as an assistant manager. My 2nd day on the job a sales clerk who was probably 60 told me that she was not going to follow my directions "because I was too short". This continued for a bit and then I fired her! I am sure she meant I was too young - but I had the manager position and she did not!

Your daughter will be fine! Sounds like maybe she needs a new teacher!

1 mom found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

S.H.

answers from Santa Barbara on

Sounds like you want to push her forward. Go for it. Try not to read too much into the fact that your child is short and the teacher is tall unless the teacher said she is small, therefore needs to be held back (it did not sound like she said that from what you wrote). Consider yourself lucky that you might have the option. Many parents do not.

Most schools push the kids forward and it is really hard retain a child. I know several parents who realize their child might need to repeat kindergarten and the school would not let them because they were great academically. Many parents feel terrible because the child is now in 4th or 5th grade and the social aspect is dreadful.

Other parents especially in CA do not want their 13 year old daughters in Freshman year with 16 year old boys (yes, my son's kindergarten class had boys turning 7, so these boys will be 16 Freshman year).

edit for your SWH: I do not think Third Reich as much as I think the curriculum has change and what used to be taught in first grade is now expected in Kindergarten. Yes, I was a 4 year old kinder and a 16 year old Senior. I graduated 20+ years ago and things have changed.

C.C.

answers from San Francisco on

My youngest daughter ended up in Kindergarten at 4 (and not 4-almost-5, but 4). We had intended for her to repeat Kinder (she was too academically advanced for Pre-K, and had been very bored, so the Pre-K teacher actually recommended this). Anyway, long story short, she is super tiny for her age, and is still a grade ahead. Also, she has ADHD, so that makes life even more fun. We ended up pulling her out of public school after 3rd grade, and we are homeschooling now. She is 8 and is doing 4th grade language arts/history/science, and 5th grade math. She's happy and has a lot of friends (we belong to several after-school activities).

I'm wondering if the Waldorf School in Sacramento might be a good fit for your kiddo? We have a few friends with kids there, and they have all LOVED it. I know there are also a few public schools in Roseville that have the K-2 classrooms, where all of the kids in that age range are in one classroom. Some kids work ahead in some subjects, and some work a little slower. I have a friend who had two of her daughters go through a school like that in Roseville and it worked out well for both of them.

T.S.

answers from San Francisco on

Your daughter is not being "labeled" by her teacher. Her teacher, who spends several hours a day, five days a week with your child, is giving you her professional opinion.
Being less mature might be a valid reason to have her repeat K, or not, but ultimately that choice is up to you. Her size is irrelevant, unless of course, it is affecting your daughter's physical maturity and self esteem. Is she physically coordinated, can she keep up with the other kids in terms of play skills? If yes then don't worry about it.
Either way it's too early to make a decision now. The teacher has shared her thoughts and now it's up to you to see how your daughter does over the next several months.

Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

M.O.

answers from New York on

Honestly, that's the most ridiculous reason for holding a child back I've ever heard of. To the point where it's almost borderline discriminatory. What about people from ethnic groups where there's a genetic tendency to be smaller than other ethnicities? What about people who physiologically have short stature. Should they all be made to repeat grades????

It also sounds developmentally harmful. If your daughter is destined to be petite all her life, the last message in the world you want to send is that she can't compete or even be in the group because she's too small.

Just to bolster your point, though, you might want to get some outside testing done. Have her tested for first-grade readiness. If you come to the school administration with test results, you'll be in a stronger bargaining position.

M.B.

answers from Seattle on

Size has nothing to do with brainpower. If she's meeting or exceeding academic standards there is NO reason to hold her back.

There is a little boy in my daughter's grade (1st) that is still wearing 4T clothing, or something absurdly small like that. ALL the 1st graders are head and shoulders taller than him. None of the kids seem to care either. He's got such an awesome personality. His only problem, and it's not his fault at all, is that he's REALLY short.

ETA: I have a niece, Sally, who will be 11 in April. Sally is only about half a head taller than my daughter, who will be 7 in March. Sally's younger sister is a year and a day older than my daughter, and this younger sister is actually as tall, or taller than Sally. Sally also has something going on in her brain chemistry where her body thinks she's about 8 years old instead of almost 11.

Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

P.K.

answers from New York on

Can't figure out why you would consider holding her back?

Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

G.B.

answers from Oklahoma City on

I don't know why you'd consider flunking her if she can do the work and isn't failing. If she's doing the work and reading then she is going to repeat a grade that will teach her absolutely nothing, you get that right? She will not learn anything because she's passing and doing well.

There is no way I'd let her stay in kindergarten unless she was flunking. In our school district they wouldn't let you hold her back if she's academically doing well.

For Updates and Special Promotions
Follow Us

Related Questions