How Long to Wait Before Trying for Baby #2

Updated on September 22, 2008
S.B. asks from Los Angeles, CA
6 answers

I've read that it's best to have children before the age of 35 and I've also read it's best to wait a year after having a child to start trying for a second one in order to give your body enough time to recover.

I'm almost 34 now and just had my first baby. My husband likes us to start trying for baby #2 by the end of this year. I like to wait at least a year for my body to recover.

So my question is this: is it better to wait a year for my body to recover, or is it more important to have a baby before age 35?! I know everyones body is different... but I'm just curious to hear other people's opinion on this.

Thanks =)

What can I do next?

  • Add yourAnswer own comment
  • Ask your own question Add Question
  • Join the Mamapedia community Mamapedia
  • as inappropriate
  • this with your friends

More Answers

Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

L.K.

answers from Los Angeles on

Baby #2 already?1!?! here is a funny story, my obgyn, who is in her early 40s has 2 little girls ages 2 and 3 (so she had both when she was over 35), but anyway she told me that she got pregnant with the second one when her first one was 7 months old and that her being at work where she sees 40 patients a day, delivers babies in the middle of night is easier than taking care of two little babies! She RAN back to work and her mother watches her kids :)

I wouldnt worry about the whole age thing.. my mom had my brother when she was 36, and I know a few people who had babies after 35. Only thing is you might get tested for more things :)

1 mom found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

B.B.

answers from Los Angeles on

I think that that at 35 your body will do great if you eat well and exercise regularly. I had my first at 38, great pregnancy and great delivery!

1 mom found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

M.W.

answers from Los Angeles on

S.,

I had my first child at 38. My OB told me not to focus on "35" but on the health of my body.

M.

1 mom found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

E.N.

answers from San Diego on

I don't really know much about the medical side of things, but I have two boys that are 15 months apart and I think it is great having them so close together. Our baby #2 was a surprise, but we were considering trying and I had checked with my midwife about having them so close together, she thought my body would be fine, and I can't say that I had any difficulties before, during or after either pregnancy. And my recovery after baby #2 was even faster than after the first baby (I had torn a bit with my first, but no tearing with the second and a pretty fast delivery probably helped). I felt great immediately after he was born. My mom had 7 children and the first 4 were born within a span of 4 1/2 years. She told me that was really hard on her body. But that is 4 pregnancies very close together. I don't think only 2 pregnancies would be so hard on you. I don't know if there are considerations with having another baby so soon if there were any complications with your first pregnancy/delivery - I would check with your doctor/midwife.

A few reasons why I am glad I had them so close together: While pregnant with #2, my first baby was still taking two naps a day, so I got to have a morning and afternoon nap myself (very helpful toward the end of pregnancy when I was sooo tired). When it came time to potty train my first child, the baby was old enough that he didn't need to be held/fed constantly and it freed me to help the older child (I know so many people who have their babies 2 years apart and I don't know how you potty train a 2 year old while caring for a newborn!). And my favorite reason for having them close together is that they are best friends. They are 3 1/2 and 2 now and they are each other's favorite person in the whole world. I know that can happen with children of any age difference, and having them close together does not guarantee that they will adore each other, but it sure worked out that way in our family and I love it.

The downsides of having them so close together: Toward the end of pregnancy with the second baby, my first baby still wanted to be held quite a bit and that is difficult to be carrying around a 23 lb. toddler while 9 months pregnant (but I would say the two nap times were worth it!:) You have two babies for a little while, and that is not easy, though I don't know if having a toddler and a baby is really any easier. But babies are labor-intensive so it can be exhausting having two at the same time. You have two in diapers for a while, which didn't bother me too much, but it does get very expensive.

I hope this helps you make your decision!

1 mom found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

J.D.

answers from San Diego on

I would say to wait at least the year. I have a friend of mine who had her kids 13 monthes apart. it was okay at forst when the ;ittle one just sat where she put him but now that they are 2 and 3 they are at different points and one is independent and running everywhere and the othere is clinging and just wanting her attention. I thin k haveing the year to enjoy your first baby would be benifivial and then trying for a second so there is an almost 2 year gap. think about your first baby give him or her the attention and then have another.

1 mom found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

L.B.

answers from Los Angeles on

I had my first baby at 38, and I am pregnant with number 2 at 40. After 35 they suggest that you take some tests that you didn't have to under 35. I wouldn't worry about it. I would let your body recover and have special time with your little one.

L.

1 mom found this helpful
For Updates and Special Promotions
Follow Us

Related Questions

Related Searches