I don't think he "killed" him. (The verdict does not suggest he killed him. It suggests that a man died, under his care.) I do think his negligence lead to his death THAT day, at THAT moment. Now, the next day or the day after, Michael Jackson could have died from everything else he was doing to himself. But, he died that day, under that doctor's care. What happened the day that Dr. injected that drug, was solely the responsibility of that Dr. He KNEW what he was doing was negligent, and did it anyway. Yes, Michael Jackson played a part. Of course. However, I do think the prosecution (from what little I know) proved Michael Jackson didn't inject that propofol. Just my opinion! I do think it's the right verdict. I don't think anything but involuntary, would have been correct. I don't think he'll get much time, if any. California is pretty notorious for that. I do think he should lose his license. I would be shocked, if he didn't.
I'm actually not a Michael Jackson fan, on any level. So...I'm not blinded by talent, or anything. I just think the Dr broke law, for what he was convicted.